Skip to Content
Main content

VAN WYCK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

479
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,424

LEVEL 1

362

25%

LEVEL 2

583

41%

LEVEL 3

345

24%

LEVEL 4

134

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

172

27%

LEVEL 2

212

33%

LEVEL 3

159

25%

LEVEL 4

93

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

263
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

139

20%

LEVEL 2

292

42%

LEVEL 3

188

27%

LEVEL 4

75

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

216
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

223

31%

LEVEL 2

291

40%

LEVEL 3

157

22%

LEVEL 4

59

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

33

41%

LEVEL 4

21

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

21

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

372
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,140

LEVEL 1

293

26%

LEVEL 2

475

42%

LEVEL 3

271

24%

LEVEL 4

101

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

127

28%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

34

51%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

33

46%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

467
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,193

LEVEL 1

195

16%

LEVEL 2

531

45%

LEVEL 3

335

28%

LEVEL 4

132

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

104

19%

LEVEL 2

195

36%

LEVEL 3

154

28%

LEVEL 4

92

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

167

72%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

68

75%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

433
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,188

LEVEL 1

269

23%

LEVEL 2

486

41%

LEVEL 3

308

26%

LEVEL 4

125

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

123

24%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

142

27%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

93

39%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

49

42%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.