Skip to Content
Main content

RED HOOK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

381
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 815

LEVEL 1

151

19%

LEVEL 2

283

35%

LEVEL 3

262

32%

LEVEL 4

119

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

140

23%

LEVEL 2

222

36%

LEVEL 3

173

28%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

152

36%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

159
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

85

27%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

341
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

120

17%

LEVEL 2

250

35%

LEVEL 3

236

33%

LEVEL 4

105

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

115

22%

LEVEL 2

195

37%

LEVEL 3

150

28%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 719

LEVEL 1

73

10%

LEVEL 2

268

37%

LEVEL 3

259

36%

LEVEL 4

119

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

70

13%

LEVEL 2

205

39%

LEVEL 3

171

33%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

78

81%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

70

79%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

381
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

140

18%

LEVEL 2

279

35%

LEVEL 3

262

33%

LEVEL 4

119

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

253
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

135

22%

LEVEL 2

216

36%

LEVEL 3

173

29%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

339
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

91

14%

LEVEL 2

224

34%

LEVEL 3

226

35%

LEVEL 4

113

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

76

16%

LEVEL 2

173

36%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

72

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

64

47%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.