Skip to Content
Main content

KINDERHOOK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

184

34%

LEVEL 2

199

37%

LEVEL 3

109

20%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

84

34%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

33

29%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

113

39%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

51

38%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

164

34%

LEVEL 2

185

38%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

110

25%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

108

25%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

74

74%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

108

21%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

77

23%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

107

55%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

49

57%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

152
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

176

34%

LEVEL 2

196

37%

LEVEL 3

108

21%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.