Skip to Content
Main content

SARANAC CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

208

38%

LEVEL 2

210

38%

LEVEL 3

99

18%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

146

34%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

87

20%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

122

41%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

201

38%

LEVEL 2

205

39%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

142

34%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

135

29%

LEVEL 2

202

44%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

99

28%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

73

85%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

47

72%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

151

35%

LEVEL 2

163

38%

LEVEL 3

90

21%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

57

49%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

88

49%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.