Skip to Content
Main content

SILVER CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

161

36%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

68

34%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

119

33%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

113

28%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

48

86%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

65

92%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

123

47%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

110

50%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.