AUBURN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

238

43%

LEVEL 2

180

32%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

140

54%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

55

52%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

143

53%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

85

56%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

168

38%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

46

63%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

177

36%

LEVEL 2

174

35%

LEVEL 3

107

22%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

100

47%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

61

91%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

40

93%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

144

54%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

103

66%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.