Skip to Content
Main content

PIONEER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

256

35%

LEVEL 2

290

40%

LEVEL 3

136

19%

LEVEL 4

46

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

220

34%

LEVEL 2

234

37%

LEVEL 3

142

22%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

152

43%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

165

44%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

150

45%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

247

35%

LEVEL 2

276

40%

LEVEL 3

131

19%

LEVEL 4

42

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

205

34%

LEVEL 2

223

37%

LEVEL 3

137

23%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

172

28%

LEVEL 2

266

43%

LEVEL 3

135

22%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

128

24%

LEVEL 2

213

41%

LEVEL 3

139

26%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

84

77%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

92

79%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

68

24%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

173

42%

LEVEL 2

172

41%

LEVEL 3

53

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

152

43%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.