Skip to Content
Main content

RANDOLPH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

143

40%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

73

43%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

44

80%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

35

74%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

76

44%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.