ALLEGANY-LIMESTONE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

143

26%

LEVEL 2

240

43%

LEVEL 3

125

22%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

156

31%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

100

40%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

137

26%

LEVEL 2

222

42%

LEVEL 3

121

23%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

140

30%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

7

78%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

96

19%

LEVEL 2

224

45%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

111

25%

LEVEL 2

164

37%

LEVEL 3

123

27%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

47

72%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

84

47%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

91

46%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.