Skip to Content
Main content

A F PALMER ES / WINDSOR CENTRAL MS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

233

47%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

176

41%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

111

46%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

122

47%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

94

45%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

95

20%

LEVEL 2

215

46%

LEVEL 3

113

24%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

167

42%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

9

82%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

209

49%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

156

42%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

27

52%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

117

50%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

89

44%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.