Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

181

25%

LEVEL 2

304

42%

LEVEL 3

196

27%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

182

29%

LEVEL 2

226

36%

LEVEL 3

154

24%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

72

20%

LEVEL 2

152

42%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

109

30%

LEVEL 2

152

41%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

164

24%

LEVEL 2

281

42%

LEVEL 3

177

26%

LEVEL 4

48

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

210
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

162

28%

LEVEL 2

211

36%

LEVEL 3

143

25%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

96

15%

LEVEL 2

280

45%

LEVEL 3

194

31%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

211

40%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

85

77%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

89

83%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

197

43%

LEVEL 3

150

33%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.