Skip to Content
Main content

DANA L LYON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

174

33%

LEVEL 2

222

43%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

117

47%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

111

41%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

169

34%

LEVEL 2

210

42%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

208

48%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

69

81%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

88

50%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.