Skip to Content
Main content

GRAND CONCOURSE ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

95

51%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

43

47%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

47

40%

LEVEL 3

41

35%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

52

55%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

44

45%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

27

33%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

44

45%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

53

55%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

46

43%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

84

51%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

84

53%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

88
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

18

58%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

89

52%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

85

43%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.