GEORGE R STALEY ELEM SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

316

43%

LEVEL 2

275

37%

LEVEL 3

92

13%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

186

48%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

130

36%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

84

42%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

186

50%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

102

54%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

263

42%

LEVEL 2

236

37%

LEVEL 3

84

13%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

147

46%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

27

48%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

22

56%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

221

35%

LEVEL 2

266

42%

LEVEL 3

91

14%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

128

39%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

95

90%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

58

92%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

310

43%

LEVEL 2

275

38%

LEVEL 3

91

12%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

36

25%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

240

54%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

38

9%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

150

61%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.