Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 1 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

226

43%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

206

37%

LEVEL 3

248

44%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

125

46%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

129

47%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

119

42%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

240
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

174

42%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

240
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

185

43%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

45

50%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

50

48%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

203

46%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

153

33%

LEVEL 3

232

50%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

41

50%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

25

26%

LEVEL 2

53

56%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

310
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

185

36%

LEVEL 3

225

44%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

320
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

201

36%

LEVEL 3

248

45%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

30

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

78

44%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

196

45%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

170

44%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.