Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

115

35%

LEVEL 2

172

52%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

123

32%

LEVEL 2

182

47%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

95

55%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

69

43%

LEVEL 2

77

48%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

90

48%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

132

53%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

27

42%

LEVEL 2

32

50%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

29

37%

LEVEL 2

38

48%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

99

32%

LEVEL 2

167

54%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

170

48%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

16

76%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

81

56%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

85

47%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

71

38%

LEVEL 2

91

48%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

97

46%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.