ESSEX COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

414
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,369

LEVEL 1

442

32%

LEVEL 2

513

37%

LEVEL 3

316

23%

LEVEL 4

98

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

463
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,358

LEVEL 1

397

29%

LEVEL 2

498

37%

LEVEL 3

323

24%

LEVEL 4

140

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

248
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

175

26%

LEVEL 2

250

37%

LEVEL 3

189

28%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

292
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

143

22%

LEVEL 2

227

34%

LEVEL 3

191

29%

LEVEL 4

101

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

267

38%

LEVEL 2

263

38%

LEVEL 3

127

18%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

254

36%

LEVEL 2

271

39%

LEVEL 3

132

19%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

401
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,325

LEVEL 1

428

32%

LEVEL 2

496

37%

LEVEL 3

308

23%

LEVEL 4

93

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

450
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,315

LEVEL 1

382

29%

LEVEL 2

483

37%

LEVEL 3

315

24%

LEVEL 4

135

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

405
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,167

LEVEL 1

290

25%

LEVEL 2

472

40%

LEVEL 3

307

26%

LEVEL 4

98

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,098

LEVEL 1

196

18%

LEVEL 2

452

41%

LEVEL 3

311

28%

LEVEL 4

139

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

152

75%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

201

77%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

286
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

139

21%

LEVEL 2

249

37%

LEVEL 3

213

32%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

111

18%

LEVEL 2

217

34%

LEVEL 3

195

31%

LEVEL 4

107

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

303

44%

LEVEL 2

264

38%

LEVEL 3

103

15%

LEVEL 4

25

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

286

39%

LEVEL 2

281

39%

LEVEL 3

128

18%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.