Skip to Content
Main content

MONROE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,059
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,400

LEVEL 1

13,653

41%

LEVEL 2

9,688

29%

LEVEL 3

6,789

20%

LEVEL 4

3,270

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,228
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,778

LEVEL 1

12,200

35%

LEVEL 2

10,350

30%

LEVEL 3

8,069

23%

LEVEL 4

4,159

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,694
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,330

LEVEL 1

5,847

36%

LEVEL 2

4,789

29%

LEVEL 3

3,699

23%

LEVEL 4

1,995

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,901
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,010

LEVEL 1

5,090

30%

LEVEL 2

5,019

30%

LEVEL 3

4,313

25%

LEVEL 4

2,588

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,365
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,070

LEVEL 1

7,806

46%

LEVEL 2

4,899

29%

LEVEL 3

3,090

18%

LEVEL 4

1,275

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,327
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,768

LEVEL 1

7,110

40%

LEVEL 2

5,331

30%

LEVEL 3

3,756

21%

LEVEL 4

1,571

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

328
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 846

LEVEL 1

243

29%

LEVEL 2

275

33%

LEVEL 3

216

26%

LEVEL 4

112

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

478
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,041

LEVEL 1

249

24%

LEVEL 2

314

30%

LEVEL 3

316

30%

LEVEL 4

162

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

26

43%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

27

42%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

760
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,689

LEVEL 1

470

28%

LEVEL 2

459

27%

LEVEL 3

437

26%

LEVEL 4

323

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

835
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,676

LEVEL 1

395

24%

LEVEL 2

446

27%

LEVEL 3

498

30%

LEVEL 4

337

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,498
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,438

LEVEL 1

3,594

22%

LEVEL 2

5,346

33%

LEVEL 3

4,964

30%

LEVEL 4

2,534

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,910
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,365

LEVEL 1

3,072

18%

LEVEL 2

5,383

31%

LEVEL 3

5,667

33%

LEVEL 4

3,243

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

861
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,629

LEVEL 1

6,403

66%

LEVEL 2

2,365

25%

LEVEL 3

695

7%

LEVEL 4

166

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,189
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,543

LEVEL 1

5,643

59%

LEVEL 2

2,711

28%

LEVEL 3

950

10%

LEVEL 4

239

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

600
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,738

LEVEL 1

2,917

62%

LEVEL 2

1,221

26%

LEVEL 3

468

10%

LEVEL 4

132

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

804
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,088

LEVEL 1

2,814

55%

LEVEL 2

1,470

29%

LEVEL 3

627

12%

LEVEL 4

177

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,897
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29,191

LEVEL 1

10,105

35%

LEVEL 2

9,189

31%

LEVEL 3

6,651

23%

LEVEL 4

3,246

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,054
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,454

LEVEL 1

8,699

29%

LEVEL 2

9,701

32%

LEVEL 3

7,913

26%

LEVEL 4

4,141

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

162
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,209

LEVEL 1

3,548

84%

LEVEL 2

499

12%

LEVEL 3

138

3%

LEVEL 4

24

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

174
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,324

LEVEL 1

3,501

81%

LEVEL 2

649

15%

LEVEL 3

156

4%

LEVEL 4

18

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,011
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,557

LEVEL 1

12,077

38%

LEVEL 2

9,469

30%

LEVEL 3

6,745

21%

LEVEL 4

3,266

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,193
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,881

LEVEL 1

10,625

32%

LEVEL 2

10,063

31%

LEVEL 3

8,036

24%

LEVEL 4

4,157

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,843

LEVEL 1

1,576

86%

LEVEL 2

219

12%

LEVEL 3

44

2%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,897

LEVEL 1

1,575

83%

LEVEL 2

287

15%

LEVEL 3

33

2%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,885
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,829

LEVEL 1

2,874

18%

LEVEL 2

5,070

32%

LEVEL 3

5,052

32%

LEVEL 4

2,833

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,370
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,777

LEVEL 1

2,400

14%

LEVEL 2

5,007

30%

LEVEL 3

5,820

35%

LEVEL 4

3,550

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,174
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,571

LEVEL 1

10,779

61%

LEVEL 2

4,618

26%

LEVEL 3

1,737

10%

LEVEL 4

437

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,858
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,001

LEVEL 1

9,800

54%

LEVEL 2

5,343

30%

LEVEL 3

2,249

12%

LEVEL 4

609

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

10,056
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,392

LEVEL 1

13,648

41%

LEVEL 2

9,688

29%

LEVEL 3

6,786

20%

LEVEL 4

3,270

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

12,226
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,763

LEVEL 1

12,191

35%

LEVEL 2

10,346

30%

LEVEL 3

8,067

23%

LEVEL 4

4,159

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.