Skip to Content
Main content

BRIARCLIFF MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

147

45%

LEVEL 4

70

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

70

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

74

49%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

73

41%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

20

44%

LEVEL 4

13

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

123

46%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

90

36%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

65%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

144

47%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

121

40%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.