Skip to Content
Main content

H C CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

116

20%

LEVEL 3

203

35%

LEVEL 4

218

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

70

18%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

177

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

117

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

108

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

101

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

69

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

18

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

18

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

385
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

102

19%

LEVEL 3

195

37%

LEVEL 4

190

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

144

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

92

18%

LEVEL 3

192

38%

LEVEL 4

215

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

174

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

34

47%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

414
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

112

20%

LEVEL 3

199

35%

LEVEL 4

215

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

293
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

173

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.