Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT E BELL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

43

7%

LEVEL 2

154

26%

LEVEL 3

245

42%

LEVEL 4

147

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

139

25%

LEVEL 3

226

40%

LEVEL 4

165

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

87

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

214
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

114

41%

LEVEL 4

100

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

209
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

149

47%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

32

44%

LEVEL 4

31

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

42

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

289
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

188

42%

LEVEL 4

101

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

289
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

182

43%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

135

25%

LEVEL 3

239

44%

LEVEL 4

145

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

117

23%

LEVEL 3

218

43%

LEVEL 4

164

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

18

40%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

22

45%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

383
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

237

42%

LEVEL 4

146

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

382
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

129

24%

LEVEL 3

220

41%

LEVEL 4

162

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.