Skip to Content
Main content

IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

141

38%

LEVEL 4

111

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

122

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

62

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

65

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

57

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

22

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

19

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

90

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

136

39%

LEVEL 4

107

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

121

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

132

39%

LEVEL 4

105

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

119

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.