Skip to Content
Main content

GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

261

33%

LEVEL 2

309

39%

LEVEL 3

162

20%

LEVEL 4

70

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

234

29%

LEVEL 2

289

36%

LEVEL 3

195

24%

LEVEL 4

82

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

157

37%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

148

35%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

227

32%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

148

21%

LEVEL 4

63

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

198

28%

LEVEL 2

252

36%

LEVEL 3

178

25%

LEVEL 4

71

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

15

37%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

153

23%

LEVEL 2

286

43%

LEVEL 3

159

24%

LEVEL 4

69

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

132

19%

LEVEL 2

270

40%

LEVEL 3

193

29%

LEVEL 4

82

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

108

80%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

102

83%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

86

20%

LEVEL 2

136

32%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

174

48%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

148

39%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.