Skip to Content
Main content

GREAT HOLLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

134

38%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

71

43%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

19

42%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

153

41%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

133

41%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.