Skip to Content
Main content

NESAQUAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

62

42%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

58

44%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

109

40%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

23

62%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

108

37%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

88

35%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.