Skip to Content
Main content

CAMPBELL-SAVONA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

133

38%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

77

45%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

79

28%

LEVEL 2

119

42%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

54

84%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.