SENECA FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

174

38%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

193

38%

LEVEL 2

144

28%

LEVEL 3

117

23%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

119

46%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

130

34%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

141

34%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

132

30%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

116

26%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

61

94%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

112

53%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

135

53%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.