POTSDAM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

114

22%

LEVEL 2

173

34%

LEVEL 3

143

28%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

106

22%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

77

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

34

81%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

48

74%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

114

36%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

64

44%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

81

41%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.