NYACK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

184

40%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

86

19%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

89

41%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

113

47%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

25

48%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

59

44%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

56

52%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

34

44%

LEVEL 2

31

40%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

58

57%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

129

43%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

55

87%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

37

86%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

121

39%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

88

59%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

65

53%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.