Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

92

34%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

101

35%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

105

44%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

69

27%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

32

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

57

42%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

63

42%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.