OTEGO-UNADILLA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

67

48%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

69

45%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

96

36%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

113

47%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

115

45%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

46

85%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

35

80%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.