Skip to Content
Main content

VICTOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

88

22%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

125

32%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

68

29%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

31

76%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

24

47%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.