Skip to Content
Main content

EDWARD TOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

122

22%

LEVEL 2

188

34%

LEVEL 3

172

31%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

160

35%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

71

14%

LEVEL 2

170

35%

LEVEL 3

171

35%

LEVEL 4

79

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

51

73%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

121

33%

LEVEL 3

133

36%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.