Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #30 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,315
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,326

LEVEL 1

5,038

27%

LEVEL 2

6,973

38%

LEVEL 3

4,284

23%

LEVEL 4

2,031

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,073
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,322

LEVEL 1

3,883

21%

LEVEL 2

6,366

35%

LEVEL 3

5,137

28%

LEVEL 4

2,936

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,540
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,017

LEVEL 1

2,021

22%

LEVEL 2

3,456

38%

LEVEL 3

2,336

26%

LEVEL 4

1,204

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,499
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,065

LEVEL 1

1,465

16%

LEVEL 2

3,101

34%

LEVEL 3

2,734

30%

LEVEL 4

1,765

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,775
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,309

LEVEL 1

3,017

32%

LEVEL 2

3,517

38%

LEVEL 3

1,948

21%

LEVEL 4

827

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,574
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,257

LEVEL 1

2,418

26%

LEVEL 2

3,265

35%

LEVEL 3

2,403

26%

LEVEL 4

1,171

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

59
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

37

39%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

89
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

37
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

19

21%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,221
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,052

LEVEL 1

562

14%

LEVEL 2

1,269

31%

LEVEL 3

1,327

33%

LEVEL 4

894

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,607
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,128

LEVEL 1

453

11%

LEVEL 2

1,068

26%

LEVEL 3

1,407

34%

LEVEL 4

1,200

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,285
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,659

LEVEL 1

436

16%

LEVEL 2

938

35%

LEVEL 3

807

30%

LEVEL 4

478

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,553
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,634

LEVEL 1

318

12%

LEVEL 2

763

29%

LEVEL 3

861

33%

LEVEL 4

692

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

212
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,161

LEVEL 1

516

44%

LEVEL 2

433

37%

LEVEL 3

159

14%

LEVEL 4

53

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

327
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,157

LEVEL 1

426

37%

LEVEL 2

404

35%

LEVEL 3

258

22%

LEVEL 4

69

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,501
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,273

LEVEL 1

3,496

34%

LEVEL 2

4,276

42%

LEVEL 3

1,943

19%

LEVEL 4

558

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,461
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,188

LEVEL 1

2,658

26%

LEVEL 2

4,069

40%

LEVEL 3

2,545

25%

LEVEL 4

916

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,159
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,343

LEVEL 1

3,038

20%

LEVEL 2

6,146

40%

LEVEL 3

4,148

27%

LEVEL 4

2,011

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,825
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,326

LEVEL 1

2,123

14%

LEVEL 2

5,378

35%

LEVEL 3

4,920

32%

LEVEL 4

2,905

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

156
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,983

LEVEL 1

2,000

67%

LEVEL 2

827

28%

LEVEL 3

136

5%

LEVEL 4

20

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

248
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,996

LEVEL 1

1,760

59%

LEVEL 2

988

33%

LEVEL 3

217

7%

LEVEL 4

31

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,213
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,709

LEVEL 1

3,251

21%

LEVEL 2

6,245

40%

LEVEL 3

4,191

27%

LEVEL 4

2,022

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,974
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,900

LEVEL 1

2,328

15%

LEVEL 2

5,598

35%

LEVEL 3

5,048

32%

LEVEL 4

2,926

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,617

LEVEL 1

1,787

68%

LEVEL 2

728

28%

LEVEL 3

93

4%

LEVEL 4

9

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,422

LEVEL 1

1,555

64%

LEVEL 2

768

32%

LEVEL 3

89

4%

LEVEL 4

10

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,382
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,210

LEVEL 1

1,015

19%

LEVEL 2

1,813

35%

LEVEL 3

1,457

28%

LEVEL 4

925

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,026
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,462

LEVEL 1

817

15%

LEVEL 2

1,619

30%

LEVEL 3

1,711

31%

LEVEL 4

1,315

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,933
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,116

LEVEL 1

4,023

31%

LEVEL 2

5,160

39%

LEVEL 3

2,827

22%

LEVEL 4

1,106

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,047
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,860

LEVEL 1

3,066

24%

LEVEL 2

4,747

37%

LEVEL 3

3,426

27%

LEVEL 4

1,621

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.