Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #25 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,512
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,063

LEVEL 1

3,086

20%

LEVEL 2

5,465

36%

LEVEL 3

4,281

28%

LEVEL 4

2,231

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,163
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,429

LEVEL 1

2,403

16%

LEVEL 2

4,863

32%

LEVEL 3

5,145

33%

LEVEL 4

3,018

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,517
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,316

LEVEL 1

1,162

16%

LEVEL 2

2,637

36%

LEVEL 3

2,201

30%

LEVEL 4

1,316

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,398
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,467

LEVEL 1

871

12%

LEVEL 2

2,198

29%

LEVEL 3

2,643

35%

LEVEL 4

1,755

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,995
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,747

LEVEL 1

1,924

25%

LEVEL 2

2,828

37%

LEVEL 3

2,080

27%

LEVEL 4

915

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,765
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,962

LEVEL 1

1,532

19%

LEVEL 2

2,665

33%

LEVEL 3

2,502

31%

LEVEL 4

1,263

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

57
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

37

45%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

22
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

24

42%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

28
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4,066
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,901

LEVEL 1

1,303

16%

LEVEL 2

2,532

32%

LEVEL 3

2,516

32%

LEVEL 4

1,550

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5,068
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,390

LEVEL 1

1,033

12%

LEVEL 2

2,289

27%

LEVEL 3

2,975

35%

LEVEL 4

2,093

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,092
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,450

LEVEL 1

445

18%

LEVEL 2

913

37%

LEVEL 3

741

30%

LEVEL 4

351

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,240
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,290

LEVEL 1

306

13%

LEVEL 2

744

32%

LEVEL 3

793

35%

LEVEL 4

447

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

230
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 862

LEVEL 1

264

31%

LEVEL 2

368

43%

LEVEL 3

175

20%

LEVEL 4

55

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

301
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

194

24%

LEVEL 2

300

38%

LEVEL 3

230

29%

LEVEL 4

71

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,074
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,730

LEVEL 1

1,054

28%

LEVEL 2

1,602

43%

LEVEL 3

815

22%

LEVEL 4

259

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,469
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,813

LEVEL 1

857

22%

LEVEL 2

1,487

39%

LEVEL 3

1,089

29%

LEVEL 4

380

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,268
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,593

LEVEL 1

1,752

14%

LEVEL 2

4,573

36%

LEVEL 3

4,073

32%

LEVEL 4

2,195

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,803
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,985

LEVEL 1

1,231

9%

LEVEL 2

3,951

30%

LEVEL 3

4,842

37%

LEVEL 4

2,961

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

244
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,470

LEVEL 1

1,334

54%

LEVEL 2

892

36%

LEVEL 3

208

8%

LEVEL 4

36

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

360
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,444

LEVEL 1

1,172

48%

LEVEL 2

912

37%

LEVEL 3

303

12%

LEVEL 4

57

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,348
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,252

LEVEL 1

1,990

15%

LEVEL 2

4,914

37%

LEVEL 3

4,139

31%

LEVEL 4

2,209

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,978
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,681

LEVEL 1

1,433

10%

LEVEL 2

4,270

31%

LEVEL 3

4,974

36%

LEVEL 4

3,004

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

164
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,811

LEVEL 1

1,096

61%

LEVEL 2

551

30%

LEVEL 3

142

8%

LEVEL 4

22

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,748

LEVEL 1

970

55%

LEVEL 2

593

34%

LEVEL 3

171

10%

LEVEL 4

14

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,450
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,566

LEVEL 1

670

15%

LEVEL 2

1,446

32%

LEVEL 3

1,521

33%

LEVEL 4

929

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,946
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,789

LEVEL 1

563

12%

LEVEL 2

1,280

27%

LEVEL 3

1,716

36%

LEVEL 4

1,230

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,062
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,497

LEVEL 1

2,416

23%

LEVEL 2

4,019

38%

LEVEL 3

2,760

26%

LEVEL 4

1,302

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,217
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,640

LEVEL 1

1,840

17%

LEVEL 2

3,583

34%

LEVEL 3

3,429

32%

LEVEL 4

1,788

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.