Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #21 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,844
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,014

LEVEL 1

3,340

24%

LEVEL 2

4,830

34%

LEVEL 3

3,769

27%

LEVEL 4

2,075

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,943
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,320

LEVEL 1

2,884

20%

LEVEL 2

4,493

31%

LEVEL 3

4,161

29%

LEVEL 4

2,782

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,301
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,029

LEVEL 1

1,388

20%

LEVEL 2

2,340

33%

LEVEL 3

2,041

29%

LEVEL 4

1,260

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,901
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,168

LEVEL 1

1,128

16%

LEVEL 2

2,139

30%

LEVEL 3

2,168

30%

LEVEL 4

1,733

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,543
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,985

LEVEL 1

1,952

28%

LEVEL 2

2,490

36%

LEVEL 3

1,728

25%

LEVEL 4

815

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,042
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,152

LEVEL 1

1,756

25%

LEVEL 2

2,354

33%

LEVEL 3

1,993

28%

LEVEL 4

1,049

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

60
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

34

32%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

111
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

53

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

22
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,033
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,822

LEVEL 1

631

17%

LEVEL 2

1,158

30%

LEVEL 3

1,211

32%

LEVEL 4

822

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,227
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,881

LEVEL 1

546

14%

LEVEL 2

1,108

29%

LEVEL 3

1,249

32%

LEVEL 4

978

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,660
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,231

LEVEL 1

890

17%

LEVEL 2

1,681

32%

LEVEL 3

1,658

32%

LEVEL 4

1,002

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,147
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,316

LEVEL 1

758

14%

LEVEL 2

1,411

27%

LEVEL 3

1,755

33%

LEVEL 4

1,392

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

249
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,302

LEVEL 1

525

40%

LEVEL 2

528

41%

LEVEL 3

195

15%

LEVEL 4

54

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

347
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,298

LEVEL 1

447

34%

LEVEL 2

504

39%

LEVEL 3

260

20%

LEVEL 4

87

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

821
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,501

LEVEL 1

1,266

36%

LEVEL 2

1,414

40%

LEVEL 3

664

19%

LEVEL 4

157

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,089
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,605

LEVEL 1

1,096

30%

LEVEL 2

1,420

39%

LEVEL 3

824

23%

LEVEL 4

265

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,614
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,519

LEVEL 1

1,875

16%

LEVEL 2

4,030

35%

LEVEL 3

3,571

31%

LEVEL 4

2,043

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,653
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,799

LEVEL 1

1,508

13%

LEVEL 2

3,638

31%

LEVEL 3

3,920

33%

LEVEL 4

2,733

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

230
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,495

LEVEL 1

1,465

59%

LEVEL 2

800

32%

LEVEL 3

198

8%

LEVEL 4

32

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

290
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,521

LEVEL 1

1,376

55%

LEVEL 2

855

34%

LEVEL 3

241

10%

LEVEL 4

49

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,755
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,440

LEVEL 1

2,267

18%

LEVEL 2

4,418

36%

LEVEL 3

3,691

30%

LEVEL 4

2,064

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,865
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,644

LEVEL 1

1,776

14%

LEVEL 2

4,003

32%

LEVEL 3

4,089

32%

LEVEL 4

2,776

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,574

LEVEL 1

1,073

68%

LEVEL 2

412

26%

LEVEL 3

78

5%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,676

LEVEL 1

1,108

66%

LEVEL 2

490

29%

LEVEL 3

72

4%

LEVEL 4

6

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,520
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,490

LEVEL 1

645

14%

LEVEL 2

1,325

30%

LEVEL 3

1,469

33%

LEVEL 4

1,051

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,926
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,666

LEVEL 1

593

13%

LEVEL 2

1,147

25%

LEVEL 3

1,549

33%

LEVEL 4

1,377

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,324
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,524

LEVEL 1

2,695

28%

LEVEL 2

3,505

37%

LEVEL 3

2,300

24%

LEVEL 4

1,024

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,017
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,654

LEVEL 1

2,291

24%

LEVEL 2

3,346

35%

LEVEL 3

2,612

27%

LEVEL 4

1,405

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.