Skip to Content
Main content

PS 160 WALT DISNEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

73

46%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

37

43%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

45

45%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

26

48%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

24

47%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

31

28%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

42

82%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

37

67%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

56

49%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

48

39%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.