PS 111 SETON FALLS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

204

62%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

164

49%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

87

56%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

66

40%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

117

68%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

98

56%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

124

60%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

72

65%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

57

47%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

126

53%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

117

47%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

78

88%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

74

86%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

189

61%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

149

47%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

187

61%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

152

49%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.