Skip to Content
Main content

PS 130 ABRAM STEVENS HEWITT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

135

63%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

116

51%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

62

61%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

48

51%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

73

65%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

68

51%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

35

60%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

26

44%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

97

66%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

88

55%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

93

57%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

68

39%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

48

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

97

59%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

76

43%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

38

79%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

40

80%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

21

38%

LEVEL 2

27

49%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

109

63%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

95

55%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.