Skip to Content
Main content

PS 48 PO MICHAEL J BUCZEK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

115

44%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

117

43%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

46

38%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

70

52%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

71

48%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

112

46%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

113

43%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

80

40%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

72

36%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

45

65%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

84

43%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

46

73%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

51

74%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

112

46%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

114

44%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.