Skip to Content
Main content

H FRANK CAREY HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

84

44%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

56

41%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

49

56%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

35

34%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

19

49%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

14

48%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

56

49%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

83

49%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

15

71%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

74

48%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.