Skip to Content
Main content

WAYLAND-COHOCTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

85

46%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

72

46%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

133

40%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

122

44%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

63

44%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

59

34%

LEVEL 2

78

45%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.