Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

213

35%

LEVEL 2

223

36%

LEVEL 3

116

19%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

147

25%

LEVEL 2

227

38%

LEVEL 3

160

27%

LEVEL 4

61

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

124

39%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

206

35%

LEVEL 2

209

36%

LEVEL 3

111

19%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

141

25%

LEVEL 2

217

38%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

214

39%

LEVEL 3

115

21%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

212

40%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

55

85%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

42

71%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

124

37%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

131

49%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

94

37%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.