SIDNEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

130

34%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

115

38%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

116

35%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

36

90%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

30

86%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

125

34%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

89

45%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

106

43%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.