Skip to Content
Main content

NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

295

45%

LEVEL 2

207

32%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

229

40%

LEVEL 2

184

32%

LEVEL 3

121

21%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

119

37%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

176

54%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

140

48%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

263

45%

LEVEL 2

187

32%

LEVEL 3

108

18%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

207

40%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

106

21%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

15

75%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

202

37%

LEVEL 2

192

36%

LEVEL 3

116

21%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

136

29%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

93

85%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

93

86%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

197

56%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

142

51%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

147
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

292

45%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.