FREDONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

125

38%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

61

42%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

93

33%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

50

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

47

87%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

72

58%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

73

53%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.