Skip to Content
Main content

GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

236

50%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

67

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

230

48%

LEVEL 2

148

31%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

85

37%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

132

55%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

145

58%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

37

56%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

120

43%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

68

64%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

61

55%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

184

44%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

177

42%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

52

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

53

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

204

57%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

206

54%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.