HARPURSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

126

45%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

74

51%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

80

49%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

121

46%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

118

44%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

44

83%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

40

89%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

47

42%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

91

53%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.