Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST EAST NY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

87

19%

LEVEL 2

222

47%

LEVEL 3

130

28%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

167

38%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

114

46%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

104

48%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

96

49%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

133
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

186

47%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

182
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

35

56%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

31

44%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

200

48%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

163

42%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

30

55%

LEVEL 2

22

40%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

24

48%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

34

40%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

188

49%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.