Skip to Content
Main content

LEADERSHIP PREP BEDFORD STUYVESANT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

71

17%

LEVEL 2

172

42%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

184

40%

LEVEL 4

84

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

98

42%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

149
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

152

41%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

234
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

161

39%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

157

43%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

174

42%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

30

63%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

49

43%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

137

44%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

132

38%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.